• Home
  • Podcast
    • Specials
  • Interviews
  • Movie Reviews
  • TV Reviews
  • DVD Reviews
  • Columns
  • News
    • TV News
    • Film News
    • DVD News
    • Comics News
    • Online Entertainment News
    • Music News
    • Book News
    • Space News

Slice of SciFi

This is How We Geek Out: Interviews, Reviews & More

  • Writers, After Dark
  • The Babylon Podcast
  • Slice of SciFi TV
  • Charlie Jade Verse
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
Reviewing “SPECTRE” James Bond delivers once again, despite a few plot machinations that fail to resonate

Reviewing “SPECTRE” James Bond delivers once again, despite a few plot machinations that fail to resonate

November 5, 2015 By Gini Koch Leave a Comment

True Confession: I love spy movies. I like them when they follow the typical formula, and I like them when they subvert their formula. And James Bond is “the” spy – it’s easy to look at almost any spy story or character of the past 50 years and connect their dots easily back to Bond.

True Confession 2: Spy movies are, at their cores, ridiculous. No real spy is so gorgeous that every woman he sees will rip her clothes off to be with him. Spies have to be dull and blend in, be the people you don’t even realize you see. They also can’t be blowing up cities and monuments and such in their regular day-to-day jobs. However, barring a few exceptions, watching dull people do not much isn’t exciting. And therefore, we go into spy movies with our disbelief fully suspended. As long as the spy movie entertains, we’re willing to believe that the best spy in the world shares his real name 24/7 with good guys and bad buys alike.

The Bond franchise is one of the most recognized worldwide movie brands. As a character he’s been around a long time and been played by a variety of actors. Bond is all that kept MGM afloat for a long time. Bond got long in the tooth often and then was replaced with a younger man who still had gone through all that his predecessors had (with a startling ability to forget just who and what the Big Bad was). Bond was sexist, and then he was funny, and then he was soulful, and then he was smooth. And then – he was all brutal cool.

Starting with Casino Royale, the franchise was rebooted in a way it hadn’t been before. We started with Bond in the beginning, as if all the Bonds before were in an alternate universe, not just the same characters in different skin. And it worked. Well. In SPECTRE, Daniel Craig’s fourth outing as Bond and the fourth film of the “new” Bond, we’re seeing what appears to be a final act story arc for the character.

SPECTRE takes place shortly after the events of Skyfall, with MI6 in shambles, a new money cruncher type, Max aka C (Andrew Scott), taking over and looking to get rid of the 00’s, and Bond off doing Bond things – breaking the rules to save the day.

SPECTRE
Daniel Craig — SPECTRE © 2015 Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc.

We don’t find out why Bond is breaking these particular rules until the movie is well underway and after he’s romanced Lucia (Monica Bellucci, severely deglamorized and portraying the first age-appropriate pairing for Bond in, possibly, ever – but sadly, she’s not in the movie long), whose husband he killed for “reasons”. Bond is grounded but of course he still gets Q (Ben Whishaw) and Moneypenny (Naomie Harris) to help him out, and even M (Ralph Fiennes) comes around after a while. Because Bond, as we’ve learned, is never wrong. Along the way to discovering just what SPECTRE is (sort of) and identifying the Big Bad (Christoph Waltz), Bond also finds yet another woman to fall in love with and have to save and protect, Madeleine Swann (Lea Seydoux).

The acting is all good, and I must say that I’m becoming a huge Dave Bautista fangirl, because he’s great in this movie, just like he’s been in all his movies. The stunts are, as always, amazing. I particularly liked the opening scene in Mexico City during the Day of the Dead festival. There are a lot less gadgets for Bond in this one, though there are some humorous nods to former stunts from the Bonds Who Came Before.

SPECTRE
Ben Whishaw and Daniel Craig — SPECTRE © 2015 Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc.

Don’t expect to see any skin (crushing for those of us looking forward to Daniel Craig being naked or close to again) or really any sex. We see the start of the sexy times and then we zoom ahead to the hour or the morning after. The only skin in this movie is during the opening credits. This is an extremely chaste Bond movie, reminiscent of the two Timothy Dalton outings.

There are issues with this movie, though. First off, the sound was a problem. Too many background noises were too loud and drowned out dialog, making a twisty plot hard to follow. I still have no idea why Bond went to certain locations, though I assume it was discussed and just drowned out by background noise.

A bigger issue, though, is that the giant twist in this movie – who our bad guy really is and really is to Bond – is ridiculous. I’m sure it was something the writers and producers or whoever greenlit this plot point thought was genius. And it would have been genius – IF we’d ever had an inkling that the events in Bond’s childhood that are crucial to SPECTRE’s entire reason for being had ever happened. But there were no indications of this in any of the prior movies (any of them, not just the Craig movies), and without this at least being referred to or discussed in Skyfall, it comes out of the blue and isn’t believable.

Since this relationship is the entire reason for the movie and, if you believe our Big Bad, the entire reason for the three movies prior, too, you’d expect to have had an inkling that this relationship existed in Bond’s mind and experience before this movie takes place. But you don’t. And that means that the basic premise of the film, the vital twist, falls flat.

My third issue, though, is that this movie was all formula, twist included. In fact, it was a formula I’ve seen in at least four other movies this year – Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation (the best of these, and yes, M:I5 is better than SPECTRE), The Man From U.N.C.L.E., Hitman: Agent 47, and Spy (which is still the funniest movie I’ve seen all year). Basically, I spent time during the movie saying to myself, “Oh, that’s just like M:I5. That’s just like Hitman. This is just like that scene in Spy, only not funny. Wow, The Man From U.N.C.L.E. did that, too.”

SPECTRE
Daniel Craig and Léa Seydoux — SPECTRE © 2015 Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc.

The problem with all these issues is that they allowed me to notice how ridiculous certain things were – the bad guys managing to survive beat downs and destruction almost as amazingly as Bond, Bond “shaking off” a drill going into his skull, elaborate and baroque villain set ups that would have taken weeks to do versus hours, a silly and rather pointless Villain Lair, how Bond and Madeleine can be on the run and yet have tons of luggage and evening clothes, and more. Every issue allowed my disbelief to come back. And that’s not what you want in a James Bond film.

That said, the movie is still a typical Bond movie. Lots of action, amazing stunts, cackling bad guys, beautiful women, and Bond doing Bond things for Queen, Country, and MI6. If you like spy movies, then you probably like James Bond, and that means, issues or not, you’ll probably enjoy this movie. Issues and all, I did.


A cryptic message from the past sends James Bond on a rogue mission to Mexico City and eventually Rome, where he meets Lucia Sciarra (Monica Bellucci), the beautiful and forbidden widow of an infamous criminal. Bond infiltrates a secret meeting and uncovers the existence of the sinister organization known as SPECTRE.

Meanwhile back in London, Max Denbigh (Andrew Scott), the new head of the Centre for National Security, questions Bond’s actions and challenges the relevance of MI6, led by M (Ralph Fiennes). Bond covertly enlists Moneypenny (Naomie Harris) and Q (Ben Whishaw) to help him seek out Madeleine Swann (Léa Seydoux), the daughter of his old nemesis Mr. White (Jesper Christensen), who may hold the clue to untangling the web of SPECTRE. As the daughter of an assassin, she understands Bond in a way most others cannot.

As Bond ventures towards the heart of SPECTRE, he learns of a chilling connection between himself and the enemy he seeks (Christoph Waltz).

Reviewing "SPECTRE"
4

Summary

This movie was all formula, twist included.The problem with that is they allowed me to notice how ridiculous certain things were. But it’s still a typical Bond movie: lots of action, amazing stunts, cackling bad guys, beautiful women, and Bond doing Bond things for Queen, Country, and MI6. If you like spy movies, then you probably like James Bond, and that means, issues or not, you’ll probably enjoy this movie. Issues and all, I did.

Sending
User Review
0 (0 votes)

Filed Under: Film Reviews Tagged With: 007

About Gini Koch

Gini Koch writes the fast, fresh and funny Alien/Katherine "Kitty" Katt series for DAW Books, the Necropolis Enforcement Files, and the Martian Alliance Chronicles. She also has a humor collection, Random Musings from the Funny Girl. As G.J. Koch she writes the Alexander Outland series and she's made the most of multiple personality disorder by writing under a variety of other pen names as well, including Anita Ensal, Jemma Chase, A.E. Stanton, and J.C. Koch. She has stories featured in a variety of excellent anthologies, available now and upcoming, writing as Gini Koch, Anita Ensal, and J.C. Koch. Reach her via: www.ginikoch.com

Related Posts

Elba the New 007?
Bond books
Amazon Acquires “Bond” Publishing Rights
New Bond Game Coming This Fall

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts

Slice

Follow Slice of SciFi

  • bluesky
  • twitter
  • youtube
  • facebook

Listen to Slice of SciFi

  • iheartradio
  • pocketcasts
  • playerfm

Subscribe to Podcast

Apple PodcastsSpotifyiHeartRadioPodchaserTuneInRSS

  • Movie & TV Reviews

Recent Comments

  • Summer Brooks on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “I requested it. I always get a little curious when TV shows or films get abandoned or canceled then continue…”
  • anh on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “Great interview! And it’s good that it clarifies some things. But this interview…. was it requested by the publisher or…”
  • Luis on Reviewing “Return to Sender”: “Benny was a f*ck-ass dog that attacked her for no reason at all. Miranda may be a killer but she…”
  • Summer Brooks on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “The promotional material I’d received wasn’t clear enough on that for me, alas. I’d always thought Winx Fate was a…”
  • hannaferdz on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “What a huge mistake whoever wrote this. Could you at least do some research? The graphic novels aren’t a continuation…”
Neil deGrasse Tyson Bill Nye

Slice of SciFi
415 Pisgah Church Rd #302
Greensboro NC 27455-2590
602-635-6976

Artwork:
Slice of SciFi galaxy spiral designed by Tim Callender

Theme Music:
Slice of SciFi music and themes
courtesy of Sci-Fried

Sister Sites:
Writers, After Dark
The Babylon Podcast
Charlie Jade Verse
Slice of SciFi TV

Slice

Copyright Slice of SciFi © 2005–2025 · WordPress · Log in