• Home
  • Podcast
    • Specials
  • Interviews
  • Movie Reviews
  • TV Reviews
  • DVD Reviews
  • Columns
  • News
    • TV News
    • Film News
    • DVD News
    • Comics News
    • Online Entertainment News
    • Music News
    • Book News
    • Space News

Slice of SciFi

This is How We Geek Out: Interviews, Reviews & More

  • Writers, After Dark
  • The Babylon Podcast
  • Slice of SciFi TV
  • Charlie Jade Verse
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
Mulgrew: There Are Only Two “Trek” Captains

Mulgrew: There Are Only Two “Trek” Captains

October 31, 2012 By Mike Hickerson 16 Comments

Kate Mulgrew is stirring up the Trek fans with comments about how her character of Katherine Janeway and Patrick Stewart’s character of Captain Jean-Luc Picard are the only two true captains in the Star Trek universe.

The rationalization for this–those two were the only ones “lost in space” and who captained their ships for seven seasons.

“Well, there are only two captains who were lost in space who did seven years, okay? Deep Space Nine was a space station. Shatner only did three seasons. [Scott] Bakula was cancelled after four,” she tells Splitsider.

Mulgrew was reminded that Benjamin Sisko was a commander for the first two years DS9 was on the air, which she says supports her theory.

“That’s what I’m saying, it was a space station. He wasn’t in space, lost in space. Patrick Stewart and I — Picard and Janeway — were the only two intrepid, lost-in-space captains. I really think that’s true, right?” she added.

Do you agree with Mulgrew?  Or does she need a quick Vulcan nerve pinch?

Filed Under: TV News Tagged With: Star Trek

Related Posts

Win a Costume from “Star Trek Into Darkness”
Has Cumberbatch’s Character Finally Named Himself?
“Star Trek” Phaser Rifle Sold At Auction

Comments

  1. Mike Wills says

    October 31, 2012 at 11:44 am

    Wow!

    Reply
  2. Indiana Jim says

    October 31, 2012 at 2:15 pm

    There are no words.

    Reply
  3. Bob says

    October 31, 2012 at 4:26 pm

    Kaaaaaaaaaate!

    Reply
  4. Summer Brooks says

    October 31, 2012 at 4:46 pm

    So, what’s her upcoming convention schedule? Is she perhaps trying to boost ticket sales?

    Reply
  5. Lejon from Chandler says

    October 31, 2012 at 7:36 pm

    She’s really grasping at straws there. Captain is a Starfleet rank. It has nothing to do with being lost in space. If all the “Captains” in Starfleet fell into the “lost in space” category, the organization would come to an abrupt end pretty quickly.

    Perhaps she means that Janeway and Picard were the only two captains Worthy of the title. If that’s the case, well I can agree with Picard.

    Reply
  6. Guardian says

    October 31, 2012 at 11:20 pm

    Considering that Picard was never actually “lost in space”, then perhaps what she really means is that SHE was the only “worthy” captain.

    How pitiful that when a once famous actor becomes obsolete, their true color is revealed.

    Shame on you, Mulgrew.

    Reply
  7. Dan Vzare says

    November 1, 2012 at 8:34 am

    If you own/owned a ship, you’re a captain for life. That’s my philosophy, and I’m sticking to it for both space and ocean ships.

    Reply
  8. Jayson says

    November 1, 2012 at 8:47 am

    A few things come to mind:

    1. William Shatter may have only done three seasons of the series but he went on to voice the animated series and seven Star Trek films.

    2. As Guardian pointed out Picard was never “lost” in space. Unlike Captain Insaneway he didn’t get his crew stranded in another part of the galaxy (not for very long anyway)

    3. Commander then Captain Sisko became a god so chew on that you harpy!

    Reply
  9. Bob says

    November 1, 2012 at 9:23 am

    Janeway was the only one lost in space.

    By her own hand at that, so I really wouldn’t crow about it.

    Reply
  10. Bruce says

    November 1, 2012 at 3:53 pm

    That’s just mean! I’ll agree with her on Sisko (I always thought he was the weakest character in DS9), but Kirk and Archer definitely deserve to sit at the captain’s table.

    Reply
  11. Frank from West Virginia says

    November 2, 2012 at 8:37 am

    First nit-picky: It’s Kathryn Janeway not Katherine Janeway. My youngest daughter is named Kathryn after Ms. Mulgrew’s character, who (if you’re old enough to recall) was the first female character who was unquestionably in charge, and still a woman. Up to that point, women were only in charge at the implied consent of the men around them.

    Second: I really like Voyager. The problems I have with the show were the producers decison to make it old-fashioned, all the characters at the same spot at the end of the episode as the beginning, limited character progression. Imagine if they could have run like Deep Space 9 and have one episode inform all the ones after.

    So (in best whiney, internet voice) just leave Janeway alone 😉

    Reply
    • AndyMac says

      November 2, 2012 at 12:03 pm

      I agree with almost everything you said but if Kate Mulgrew is going to say that Janeway and Picard are the only “true captains” then we shouldn’t “leave Janeway” alone.

      It’s a silly statement. Picard was never “lost in space”- not for more than an episode or two anyway.

      And why does one need to be “lost in space” to be a captain anyway?

      Reply
  12. Jake says

    November 3, 2012 at 12:05 pm

    S@%t that Janeway says?…

    Reply
  13. Sybok says

    November 5, 2012 at 3:02 pm

    Um, Kirk may have done only 3 television seasons, due to network stupidity. But then there were two seasons of animated episodes and six theatrical movies. He was still going strong in Star Trek Generations almost 30 years later. Think Captain Janeway will be around that long? 😛

    Reply
  14. Hil says

    November 8, 2012 at 10:40 pm

    I always subscribed to the “baldest” rule. The less hair they had the better the captain. Sisko became a badass when he lost the hair. Kirk might have been hiding hair issues, but those same issues keep him higher on my list. Janeway had a lot of hair. She was flat out least favorite. It’s almost scientific.

    Reply
  15. Ben Ragunton says

    November 10, 2012 at 1:52 pm

    Her argument that her and Picard were also lost in space is rubbish. The Enterprise D was NEVER lost in space, and technically neither was Voyager. Once they had their bearings (which occurred by the end of the pilot) they started on their way back. They were not really lost. They were just REEEEEALLLY far away and had a long way to go. Besides, after a time they were able to establish contact with Starfleet Command and were even given mission orders from time to time. So no, they weren’t lost. Sorry Kate, but you got this one wrong.

    This then leaves it to the 7 year rule. Really? Is that the criteria for being considered a starship Captain in Trek lore? What about the fact that it was the movies (with a certain commanding officer named Kirk sitting in the Captain’s chair) that proved to Paramount that the franchise still had enough breath in it to prompt the studio execs to bring the series back to TV? This tells me that without a certain “Captain” Kirk around that the exploits of the starship Voyager wold probably have never been told.

    Methinks you need to reconsider your words Kate. Not only have you said something which has gotten Trek fans into a lather, it is also HIGHLY inaccurate!!!

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Bruce Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts

Slice

Follow Slice of SciFi

  • bluesky
  • twitter
  • youtube
  • facebook

Listen to Slice of SciFi

  • iheartradio
  • pocketcasts
  • playerfm

Subscribe to Podcast

Apple PodcastsSpotifyiHeartRadioPodchaserTuneInRSS

  • Movie & TV Reviews

Recent Comments

  • Curt Myers on 4K Review: “Dogma” 25th Anniversary Special Edition brings a lost classic home again: “The best the movie has looked. It’s dialogue heavy so the Atmos track is rarely used. When it comes in…”
  • Summer Brooks on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “I requested it. I always get a little curious when TV shows or films get abandoned or canceled then continue…”
  • anh on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “Great interview! And it’s good that it clarifies some things. But this interview…. was it requested by the publisher or…”
  • Luis on Reviewing “Return to Sender”: “Benny was a f*ck-ass dog that attacked her for no reason at all. Miranda may be a killer but she…”
  • Summer Brooks on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “The promotional material I’d received wasn’t clear enough on that for me, alas. I’d always thought Winx Fate was a…”
Neil deGrasse Tyson Bill Nye

Slice of SciFi
415 Pisgah Church Rd #302
Greensboro NC 27455-2590
602-635-6976

Artwork:
Slice of SciFi galaxy spiral designed by Tim Callender

Theme Music:
Slice of SciFi music and themes
courtesy of Sci-Fried

Sister Sites:
Writers, After Dark
The Babylon Podcast
Charlie Jade Verse
Slice of SciFi TV

Slice

Copyright Slice of SciFi © 2005–2026 · WordPress · Log in