Kids’ stuff is a thing of the past in “Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince.” Suddenly looking quite grown up, the students at Hogwarts are forced to grapple with heavy issues of mortality, memory and loss in this sixth installment in the series of bigscreen adaptations of J.K. Rowling’s Potter tales. Dazzlingly well made and perhaps deliberately less fanciful than the previous entries, this one is played in a mode closer to palpable life-or-death drama than any of the others and is quite effective as such. Delayed by Warner Bros. from a late 2008 release date so as to spread the wealth after “The Dark Knight” scored so mightily last summer, this “Prince” is poised to follow its predecessors as one of the year’s two or three top-earning films.
Read the rest of the review HERE
I don’t know where the positive critical claim for this movie stems from, aside from the look it was downright awful. It’s as if the filmmakers slapped the 5th movie in the face and ignored all the good things it achieved. I want my money back. I found a good rant that gets to the bottom of it here: http://www.pandalous.com/topic/harry_potter_6