• Home
  • Podcast
    • Specials
  • Interviews
  • Movie Reviews
  • TV Reviews
  • DVD Reviews
  • Columns
  • News
    • TV News
    • Film News
    • DVD News
    • Comics News
    • Online Entertainment News
    • Music News
    • Book News
    • Space News

Slice of SciFi

This is How We Geek Out: Interviews, Reviews & More

  • Writers, After Dark
  • The Babylon Podcast
  • Slice of SciFi TV
  • Charlie Jade Verse
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
Australian TV Station Apologizes for “Star Trek” Mistake

Australian TV Station Apologizes for “Star Trek” Mistake

November 3, 2010 By Michael Hickerson 6 Comments

Trekkies are a nitpicky bunch. And they’re not afraid to tell you when you get a piece of continuity wrong.

In this case, it wasn’t even what many Trekkies would consider a minor continuity error. An Australian TV station mixed up who captained the Enterprise E (NCC-1701E). The station said it was commanded by Captain James T. Kirk when most “Trek” fans know it was Captain Jean-Luc Picard.

Enterprise-DThe story in question referred to a new book about British publisher Haynes printing an Owners’ Workshop Manual of the show’s USS Enterprise.

n a second article today, the site said: “[We] incorrectly stated that the Star Trek starship USS Enterprise-E, otherwise known as model NNC-1701-E, was the successor to Captain Kirk’s original USS Enterprise.

“It has since been brought to our attention that the NNC-1701-E in fact came two models after Captain Kirk retired and was under the command of Captain Jean Luc Picard.

“There was no intention whatsoever to suggest Captain Kirk may have commanded the Galaxy Class Starships Enterprise-D and Enterprise-E.”

It continued: “There were also some concerns about whether the incorrect use of the term ‘hyperspace’ in describing warp drive technology may harm the original Star Trek concept.

“No malice was intended and a correction to the original article will be made. We also agree that Patrick Stewart is a handsome man, a sentiment expressed by several readers.”

However, a comment from one reader on the second article read: “It’s NCC-1701 not NNC – you idiots.”

Filed Under: TV News Tagged With: Star Trek

About Michael Hickerson

Michael was a contributor to Slice of SciFi, as both a news curator and assistant editor, under the tutelage of former News Director Sam Sloan.

Related Posts

TrekMovie: Star Trek Mash Up Trailer
Paramount Releases “Star Trek” Motion Poster
Koenig Star Event

Comments

  1. Mitch from Omaha says

    November 4, 2010 at 12:50 am

    So many things wrong with this story, it’s not even funny.

  2. Mitch from Omaha says

    November 4, 2010 at 12:53 am

    Among them – The E-E was only two models after Kirk? Hmm, Kirk was E, and E-A. Let’s check our ABCs here a bit. A, B, C. So Picard was the captain of the Enterprise C? No, that doesn’t make sense. C plus E are not the same. Could they have meant FOUR ships? So they suck at their ABCs and math. Great job there, tv station.

    Did they get anything right? Or is Brian running the tv station now?

  3. Bronzethumb (from Australia) says

    November 4, 2010 at 1:35 am

    Australian free-to-air TV stations are some of the dumbest groups of people you’ll ever come across. Trust me on this.

  4. Chris (from Australia) says

    November 4, 2010 at 4:07 am

    It wasn’t a TV station it was a newspaper and it was a mock article anyway.

  5. Alan Edwards says

    November 4, 2010 at 5:54 pm

    When you’re already in the hole, stop digging…

    After Kirk’s original Enterprise, there was the refit, A, B, C, D and E. Didn’t Kirk take over the Enterprise-B from Harriman temporarily? That would make the C, D and E ones he didn’t command.

    The 1701-E is a Sovereign class, not Galaxy.

  6. Michael Falkner says

    November 4, 2010 at 6:24 pm

    Kirk never commanded the 1701-B. Harriman was going to transfer command, and Kirk sat in the seat, then reconsidered. He told Harriman that his place was on the bridge, then went to Engineering.

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts

Slice

Follow Slice of SciFi

  • youtube
  • bluesky
  • twitter
  • facebook

Listen to Slice of SciFi

  • iheartradio
  • pocketcasts
  • playerfm

Subscribe to Podcast

Apple PodcastsSpotifyiHeartRadioPodchaserPodcast IndexTuneInRSS

  • Movie & TV Reviews

Recent Comments

  • Kristen on Journal Now Interview With “Surface” Co-Creator: “I was just talking about this in the car this morning, not for the first time. I grew up watching…”
  • Xander Rohrig on Check Out the Cupcake Games: “its dig dug”
  • Curt Myers on 4K Review: “Dogma” 25th Anniversary Special Edition brings a lost classic home again: “The best the movie has looked. It’s dialogue heavy so the Atmos track is rarely used. When it comes in…”
  • Summer Brooks on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “I requested it. I always get a little curious when TV shows or films get abandoned or canceled then continue…”
  • anh on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “Great interview! And it’s good that it clarifies some things. But this interview…. was it requested by the publisher or…”
Neil deGrasse Tyson Bill Nye

Slice of SciFi
415 Pisgah Church Rd #302
Greensboro NC 27455-2590
602-635-6976

Artwork:
Slice of SciFi galaxy spiral designed by Tim Callender

Theme Music:
Slice of SciFi music and themes
courtesy of Sci-Fried

Sister Sites:
Writers, After Dark
The Babylon Podcast
Charlie Jade Verse
Slice of SciFi TV

Slice

Copyright Slice of SciFi © 2005–2026 · WordPress · Log in