• Home
  • Podcast
    • Specials
  • Interviews
  • Movie Reviews
  • TV Reviews
  • DVD Reviews
  • Columns
  • News
    • TV News
    • Film News
    • DVD News
    • Comics News
    • Online Entertainment News
    • Music News
    • Book News
    • Space News

Slice of SciFi

This is How We Geek Out: Interviews, Reviews & More

  • Writers, After Dark
  • The Babylon Podcast
  • Slice of SciFi TV
  • Charlie Jade Verse
  • Contact Us
    • About Us

Meyer Changed Ending of “New Moon”

November 17, 2009 By Mike Hickerson 13 Comments

If you liked the ending of Stephenie Meyer’s “New Moon,” you can thank the author’s movie.

Meyer tells Oprah Winfrey that she orginally planned the ending of the second installment in the series to be a bit more cerebral and to take place inside Bella’s head.

Meyer let her mother read the manuscript and her mother suggested that a bit more action-packed ending might be better.

And so Meyer revised the novel, and now “that whole scene at the end, that’s kind of my favorite part now, is there because my mom told me it would be better that way.”

The big-screen version of “New Moon” opens this weekend in theaters.

Filed Under: Film News Tagged With: vampires

Related Posts

Review: Sinners (2025)
“Sinners”: a superlative blend of genres and story
Katie McGrath
Will McGrath Be A Victim of “Dracula”?
Slice of SciFi 1135: How Far Does the Dark Go?
“How Far Does the Dark Go?”: Bears Rebecca Fonte on trauma, healing and vampires

Comments

  1. Mitch from Omaha says

    November 18, 2009 at 4:11 am

    “If you liked…” you’re kidding, right? The Twilight books are some of the worst garbage “written” in the last century. Seriously, anyone who has read them and calls themselves a fan should shoot themselves in the head immediately.

    Reply
  2. tanya says

    November 18, 2009 at 4:48 am

    what, you’ve never enjoyed a sci fi channel original movie or a lowbrow comedy either? sometimes its nice to curl up on the couch with a guilty pleasure. the movie was pretty bad, but the books made for some enjoyable rainy afternoons… also it may have escaped your notice (Mitch) but they’re kind of oriented towards girls.
    Now if you had said that they’re not good enough to merit all the huge fuss, I’d probably agree with you, but I felt like that about harry potter too – neither series are works of great literature, they’re just fun reads, and anything that gets people reading anymore is a good thing…

    Reply
  3. Mitch from Omaha says

    November 18, 2009 at 5:31 am

    1 – They aren’t good reads. They read like something written by a forty year old who has not yet finished the third grade.

    2 – I did read the first one, because every female in my office was clucking about it nonstop for months. It was underwritten trash, and not even enjoyable, trashy trash. To say Meyer is a talentless hack doesn’t even begin to cover it.

    3 – The movie was just awful. Though it had a huge budget, it never even tried to rise above the level of a Syfy Saturday night movie.

    4 – And most obvious … Vampires. Do. Not. Sparkle.

    5 – I keep hearing people make the same claim you have, that they are written for teenage girls. I have read books that are also written for that market. Yet they’re well-written. It seems to me that people make excuses for Meyer’s atrociously bad writing, as though it’s ok, cuz it’s for girls. I find that to be insulting.

    Reply
  4. D. C. says

    November 18, 2009 at 6:03 am

    Too bad she didn’t change the rest of the book to remove all of the suck.

    But then, if she took all of the suck out of it, the entire series would fit on a Post-it note.

    Reply
  5. Shane says

    November 18, 2009 at 9:20 am

    The best one word review of the Twilight movie I’ve seen so far is “anaemic”.

    Talentless hack she may be but every time I catch a train half the people reading books are reading a Twilight novel. Anyway I thought she threatened to give it all up because a draft of the last novel was leaked?

    Reply
  6. Valentine says

    November 18, 2009 at 5:09 pm

    Thank goodness! I seriously thought I was the only person that just didn’t like the books. I have girlfriends of mine who go on and on about these waste of trees. While reading the first one, I could not stop rolling my eyes. The heroine in the story is a co-dependant, self-deprecating girl with no ambition but to gaze into some boys eyes. You have got to be kidding me.

    Reply
  7. Michel Daw says

    November 18, 2009 at 7:06 pm

    Yup. I bet she is crying all the way to bank. Those who DON’T like it, and DON’T want more of it, just DON’T read it. I am sure that she and Rowling can console each other with their millions.

    And I will decide whether Vampires sparkle or not as soon as someone gets me one to look at.

    Reply
  8. Mitch from Omaha says

    November 18, 2009 at 8:02 pm

    Michael, why are you bringing up Rowling? She *can* write. Meyer cannot. You have failed to make a point.

    Reply
  9. D. C. says

    November 19, 2009 at 5:53 am

    No one disputes that she’s managed hit the sweet spot marketing wise.

    So has Jerry Springer. Being a financial success is hardly an indication of quality. Meyer obviously has a loyal (someone would rabid) fan base. She’s a still a complete hack as a writer.

    And, for your listening and viewing pleasure:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1glNuQiE77E

    Reply
  10. Garrett says

    November 19, 2009 at 6:41 pm

    I read the Twilight series. It was a quick, fun read that had little substance. It’s nothing I will read again, but I don’t feel that I was cheated out of my time in any way. I can see why girls eat it up, and there is nothing wrong with that.

    I don’t judge Meyer’s talent just on that one series, because that series was not designed for someone like me. I have gone on to read Host, an adult sci-fi novel – something that was written more to my demographic. Host is, IMHO, an awesome book. One of my favorites. If you pretend to know enough about Meyer to judge her causing you to not read that book, you are really missing out.

    Reply
  11. Janessa says

    November 22, 2009 at 1:50 am

    Wow.. you people really need to re-look at your life careers.. If you all think you are such amazing critics of books… maybe you should write them.. I think that J.K. Rowling is an amazing author.. and Stephanie Meyer isn’t all that bad… Let’s see what you can come up with?!?!

    Reply
  12. Nick says

    November 24, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    I dont understand how you can call the quality trash when obviously the majority disagree, not to say the majority is always right but in this case its a bit of common sense that these books were going to be widely adored. Whether the writing may not be up to par when it comes to comparing others but definitely the plot of the story makes a book and this book carries a very strong plot with it that captivates most young girls “first love experiences” per say. Not to mention that it truly is designed for the more younger audience and therefore isn’t there to overwhelm them, it’s practically dumbed down to the point where it can be better understood by more undeveloped (ie teenage girls) minds as goes with the Harry Potter series, they are not suppose to be so sophisted and advanced that the younger audience (which they were written for) can’t come to a solid relation with the characters and have a better understanding of the situations they are in. So if you feel that these novels and movies are not up to your standards then obviously you arent understanding what genre they fall under or else you wouldn’t of watched/read them in the first place. If you don’t like teenage romance novels/movies then don’t f***ing read/watch them. Quit whining about it.

    Reply
  13. Nick says

    November 24, 2009 at 3:18 pm

    Also just to note that the whole novel is based on a teenage girls perspective and narrated by her as well, so how do you expect the writing to be? Go figure.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts

Slice

Follow Slice of SciFi

  • youtube
  • bluesky
  • twitter
  • facebook

Listen to Slice of SciFi

  • iheartradio
  • pocketcasts
  • playerfm

Subscribe to Podcast

Apple PodcastsSpotifyiHeartRadioPodchaserPodcast IndexTuneInRSS

  • Movie & TV Reviews

Recent Comments

  • Xander Rohrig on Check Out the Cupcake Games: “its dig dug”
  • Curt Myers on 4K Review: “Dogma” 25th Anniversary Special Edition brings a lost classic home again: “The best the movie has looked. It’s dialogue heavy so the Atmos track is rarely used. When it comes in…”
  • Summer Brooks on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “I requested it. I always get a little curious when TV shows or films get abandoned or canceled then continue…”
  • anh on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “Great interview! And it’s good that it clarifies some things. But this interview…. was it requested by the publisher or…”
  • Luis on Reviewing “Return to Sender”: “Benny was a f*ck-ass dog that attacked her for no reason at all. Miranda may be a killer but she…”
Neil deGrasse Tyson Bill Nye

Slice of SciFi
415 Pisgah Church Rd #302
Greensboro NC 27455-2590
602-635-6976

Artwork:
Slice of SciFi galaxy spiral designed by Tim Callender

Theme Music:
Slice of SciFi music and themes
courtesy of Sci-Fried

Sister Sites:
Writers, After Dark
The Babylon Podcast
Charlie Jade Verse
Slice of SciFi TV

Slice

Copyright Slice of SciFi © 2005–2026 · WordPress · Log in