• Home
  • Podcast
    • Specials
  • Interviews
  • Movie Reviews
  • TV Reviews
  • DVD Reviews
  • Columns
  • News
    • TV News
    • Film News
    • DVD News
    • Comics News
    • Online Entertainment News
    • Music News
    • Book News
    • Space News

Slice of SciFi

This is How We Geek Out: Interviews, Reviews & More

  • Writers, After Dark
  • The Babylon Podcast
  • Slice of SciFi TV
  • Charlie Jade Verse
  • Contact Us
    • About Us

Studios Consider 60 Day Rental Window

October 28, 2011 By Mike Hickerson 6 Comments

Yesterday we reported that the big Hollywood studios were considering stretching the window between a DVD or Blu-Ray release and when consumers could rent the disc.  Now we’ve got an idea of how long Hollywood would like to make us wait.

According to Bloomberg, studios want to extend the window from 28 to 60 days.

Hollywood executives are discussing a delay of 60 days from the time DVDs go on sale and studios continue to explore ways to bolster DVD sales and digital purchases, it said.

The news comes after Kevin Tsujihara, president of Warner Bros. Home Entertainment, told the Financial Times this week that the studio is looking at lengthening the current 28 days delay.

Bloomberg didn’t detail which studios may seek a longer delay, but highlighted that beyond Warner, Universal Pictures, part of Comcast-controlled NBCUniversal, and News Corp.’s Fox currently impose the 28-day rental window on Netflix and Redbox.

Coinstar CEO Paul Davis told Bloomberg that the company has the option of buying DVDs elsewhere, but that it will continue to work with studios. “Some studios want a window and we try to work with them,” he said. “There’s a point to where it might not make sense.”

Filed Under: Entertainment Business News

Comments

  1. Hobbes says

    October 28, 2011 at 9:49 am

    So, basically they WANT people to download their movies. This will not make more people buy DVDs, if anything it will only make more people look for illegal downloads as Torrents are usually released 2 weeks before the DVD ever goes on sale.

    Reply
  2. AndyMac says

    October 28, 2011 at 10:21 am

    When are they going to get it through their dumb-ass corporate heads that the people who are waiting to rent aren’t going to buy just because they have to wait a little longer. I won’t BUY a movie until I’ve seen it. Since I never go to the theater anymore I don’t see it until I RENT it. If I like the movie then I decide if I like it enough to buy it.

    If I don’t want to wait to see it on rental, I can pay-per-view it which costs me a little more than renting but still a lot less than seeing in the theater or buying it.

    Frankly there isn’t a whole lot coming out of Hollywood that’s worth buying. Maybe that’s where these jackasses should be looking instead of trying to “force” people into buying their movies.

    Reply
  3. TardisCaptain says

    October 28, 2011 at 12:33 pm

    I would have to agree that this idea will not work at increasing sales. I currently see the advertisements about “it’s not available on Netflix for another 28 days” and I laugh. There is so much content on Netflix that I haven’t seen that I can wait the 28 days. If you force me to wait 60 days, I won’t notice.

    Hey studios, here is a hint: If you want me to buy, improve the quality of your movies & shows. Give me value for the purchase (I can’t remember the last time I saw a new DVD that included the trailers). I’ll by the DVD if I know that I want to watch it multiple times. If I only want to watch it once, I’ll wait for Netflix.

    Reply
  4. deathby2 says

    October 28, 2011 at 12:43 pm

    Oh no! They are going to increase the time I wait to not watch their crap.

    Reply
  5. sean from edwards says

    October 28, 2011 at 1:50 pm

    All this will do is ultimately increase piracy, people will pirate a poor quality bootleg to see if they want to watch before they buy, at least with rentals they get some money back.

    Reply
  6. Summer Brooks says

    October 29, 2011 at 8:26 am

    Honestly, over the past couple years, there have been fewer and fewer “must buy” titles for me, and even fewer rentals… first because of how busy I am, and second because of lack of interest in 85% of the movies that are coming out.

    For a year, I was waiting to save up the money to get Iron Man on DVD, and I watched 3 different versions come out. Eventually I realized that while I really enjoyed the first Iron Man, I didn’t really need to own it on DVD. I chose not to see the two Transformers sequels, and I just didn’t have the time to go see Iron Man 2, Thor, Captain America, or a half dozen other films I wanted to see. I saw screenings of the two Harry Potter movies, and maybe a couple others, and that’s it over the past 2-3 years.

    The now insanely short time between theatrical release and DVD release is hurting them more than it’s helping, because people are saying “it’ll be on DVD in 3-4 months, I don’t need to drop $20 to see it in a theater when I can spend that same $20 to buy it, then trade it in somewhere if it sucks.”

    I also dropped Netflix because I realized I was holding onto discs for 3 months or more, and because I don’t own a device I could do streaming on. I’d probably still be with Netflix if I had streaming and could use it to catch up on or check out some TV shows, but it would definitely not be used as much for new movies as it would be for old ones.

    Can Netflix, Redbox, Blockbuster, and those other rental services sue the studios for making crappy movies and impacting their ability to do business, or at least get an inquiry going? Seriously, blaming the rental market for a massive drop in sales is crazy, and delaying when consumers can rent just makes them go grey or black market.

    Really, don’t they at least teach something about the consumer side of Prohibition to these guys in B-school so they know about the power of supply and demand?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts

Slice

Follow Slice of SciFi

  • youtube
  • bluesky
  • twitter
  • facebook

Listen to Slice of SciFi

  • iheartradio
  • pocketcasts
  • playerfm

Subscribe to Podcast

Apple PodcastsSpotifyiHeartRadioPodchaserPodcast IndexTuneInRSS

  • Movie & TV Reviews

Recent Comments

  • Kristen on Journal Now Interview With “Surface” Co-Creator: “I was just talking about this in the car this morning, not for the first time. I grew up watching…”
  • Xander Rohrig on Check Out the Cupcake Games: “its dig dug”
  • Curt Myers on 4K Review: “Dogma” 25th Anniversary Special Edition brings a lost classic home again: “The best the movie has looked. It’s dialogue heavy so the Atmos track is rarely used. When it comes in…”
  • Summer Brooks on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “I requested it. I always get a little curious when TV shows or films get abandoned or canceled then continue…”
  • anh on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “Great interview! And it’s good that it clarifies some things. But this interview…. was it requested by the publisher or…”
Neil deGrasse Tyson Bill Nye

Slice of SciFi
415 Pisgah Church Rd #302
Greensboro NC 27455-2590
602-635-6976

Artwork:
Slice of SciFi galaxy spiral designed by Tim Callender

Theme Music:
Slice of SciFi music and themes
courtesy of Sci-Fried

Sister Sites:
Writers, After Dark
The Babylon Podcast
Charlie Jade Verse
Slice of SciFi TV

Slice

Copyright Slice of SciFi © 2005–2026 · WordPress · Log in