“Iron Man 2” opened this weekend, taking in $133 million at the domestic box-office.
So, was it worth the wait? Give us your feedback in our poll and in the comments.
Please keep SPOILERS to a minimum in the comments. Anything deemed to SPOILERific will be edited or deleted.
Robin says
While it was on par with the first film in plot complexity and overall enjoyability, it fell short in the scientific aspects. The group I saw it with was mostly engineers and physicists, so certain parts of the 70s-era comic book science were blatantly wrong and jarring, but if you can ignore that, it’s a really fun ride.
Arkle says
Enjoyed it thoroughly. Loved Sam Rockwell’s performance; he really brought the crazy.
Baldrik says
Well done, great effects etc., but wasnt it just more of the first part – best bit was Thor’s hammer…….
Kurt says
Not as good as the first but a fun time none the less. Jon Favreau tried to squeeze a little too much into the story leaving some characters and story elements a bit shortchanged; specifically Black Widow was there only as ass kicking eye candy. Also, I thought the way Tony Stark solved his Palladium poisoning problem was somewhat facile.
However, the critics who have lambasted IM2 have gone way overboard. You’d think they were watching Spiderman 3 again instead of the movie I saw.
Skiznot says
Took the batton and ran. Better than the first by building upon it. I was a little bored at the end of first one but not this time.