• Home
  • Podcast
    • Specials
  • Interviews
  • Movie Reviews
  • TV Reviews
  • DVD Reviews
  • Columns
  • News
    • TV News
    • Film News
    • DVD News
    • Comics News
    • Online Entertainment News
    • Music News
    • Book News
    • Space News

Slice of SciFi

This is How We Geek Out: Interviews, Reviews & More

  • Writers, After Dark
  • The Babylon Podcast
  • Slice of SciFi TV
  • Charlie Jade Verse
  • Contact Us
    • About Us

Grade the Premiere of “SGU”

October 12, 2009 By News Droid 18 Comments

The first two episodes of “Stargate: Universe” have aired and a lot of Slice of SciFi readers are firmly divided on the series.

What did you think of the premiere? You can tell us below in our poll and add your thoughts on the comments section (please, keep it PG-13 and respect that others may have different thoughts or ideas about the series).

Filed Under: Polls

Comments

  1. reppoHssarg says

    October 12, 2009 at 8:25 pm

    SG becomes Lost in Space!

  2. Richard Amirault says

    October 12, 2009 at 8:53 pm

    I’ll give it a shot.

    NOTE: I have never watched *any* of the other Stargate shows on TV (other than flipping by the channel for a few minutes)

  3. Arkle says

    October 12, 2009 at 9:15 pm

    Liked it more than the pilots for SG-1 and Atlantis. Now, whether the rest of the series will be like that remains to be seen, but I’m optimistic.

  4. Tom says

    October 12, 2009 at 10:54 pm

    Where is the fun/humor that has always been the trademark of the Stargate franchise. If I want dark and sullen I’d watch Battlestar again.

  5. Paul Wren says

    October 12, 2009 at 11:08 pm

    It’s more like a very desperate version of Star Trek: Voyager, even further away from Earth (although once your travel time to get home is longer than you’ll be alive, it becomes rather academic).

  6. Julian says

    October 13, 2009 at 12:31 am

    Instead of a complete ripoff of Lost (which I stopped watching when the stupid polar bear appeared in episode 1 or 2). Why not be a complete ripoff of BSG, it would be far more watchable then. The constant flashbacks that plagued Lost were so irritating and I hope they disappear quickly in SGU. My other gripe is that SGUs formula so far is:
    1. Little bit of action,
    2. a discussion between 2-3 people about their emotions,
    3. Little bit of action mixed in with a bit of self discovery
    4. more discussion of emotions with 2-3 people with a little bit of mutiny thrown in
    5. repeat 1-4 until show ends

  7. Shane says

    October 13, 2009 at 3:09 am

    A bit too soon to call it formulaic don’t you think?

    Polar bears can only improve things. Maybe SG:U needs polar bears too (not that it needs anything – after the first couple of eps I’m there).

  8. TB says

    October 13, 2009 at 11:41 am

    I thought it was excellently done. The acting was superb and the story seems solid.

    I’d like to point out that this seems in part like SG-1 resurrected. There’s definitely a military aspect and it’s about discovering new worlds. There just the addition of civilians and an ancient spaceship, which builds on the original SG-1 premise. So it’s good, I like it and will continue to watch.

  9. ejdalise says

    October 13, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    If I had kids, and if they had kids, I would be one day be able to tell my grandchildren about the exact moment this series lost me. It was when the creepy doctors mentions he has a Ancients communication stone and O’Neil has put him in charge . . . and then nothing is said or done with the communicator for the next hour of the two hour premiere.

    Let’s recap . . . a bunch of people stranded thousand of light years away, their families and friends unsure of their fate. Plus, they are on a ship of the Ancients struggling to work out how it works, or if it even works.

    1) I’m guessing everyone on that ship would want to let their loved ones know they are still alive. Not later, but now (especially since they are sitting around not doing anything).

    2) I’m guessing they would want to tap into whatever accumulated knowledge the original SG-1 team has acquired over their lengthy investigation of stargates and the ancients.

    3) I’m guessing someone would double-check, and pronto, the statement O’Neil would put the creepy, socially inept, and possibly demented scientist “in charge”.

    Truthfully, does anyone here doubt that at least for the first week or so they would not be in constant communication with Earth?

    I am all for giving a series a chance, but the characters have to behave in a somewhat believable manner. Even discounting the apparent lack of interest in the means to communicate with loved ones back on Earth, I found none of these characters believable, and consequently the contrived conflicts failed to capture my interest, as did the “mystery” of the ship.

    I’m not seeing anything here that is likely to grow into anything worthwhile primarily because the foundation is not there. I’ll watch a the next two episodes, but seeing as this is an obvious remix of past series, they would have to step up big time, and bring some fresh ideas to the plot, for me to be interested.

    That said, I am a jaded old guy, and consequently have little patience for anything less than stellar, and I’m definitively not in the “crappy-sci-fi-is-better-than-no-sci-fi” camp. Perhaps others are starved for huge plot holes, transparently contrived conflicts any one of us would be able to resolve in 10 minutes, and characters whose angst seemed designed to irritate the audience, and make said characters as unsympathetic as possible. Me? I’ll be watching good shows, be they sci-fi or not.

  10. Tommy2Shoes says

    October 13, 2009 at 10:00 pm

    I enjoyed it! I think it is past time for Star Gate to become a touch ‘darker’ shall we say. While anyone can find issue with almost any show’s pilot, I think it was done well enough for me to give SG:U a chance!

  11. Eric says

    October 14, 2009 at 6:47 am

    The first episode (the first two hours) were not bad….. However the second episode, “AIR” was dull as dirt. We shall see.

  12. Arkle says

    October 14, 2009 at 7:47 am

    Eric: The “2nd episode” was actually the 3rd hour of the Pilot.

  13. Kwisatz Haderach says

    October 14, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    Snarkle: chill out, we all know what he meant.

  14. Robin says

    October 15, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    Since the first three hours basically make up a giant pilot episode, I’ll say that it’s been pretty solid so far. It’s set up the world and the people in it for new viewers (which was, of course, a bit heavy on the exposition for longtime fans like myself, but executed nicely). I gave it a “B” because a series’ pilot is never its strongest episode. If it is, they’re doing something very wrong. Look forward to see how it plays out from here.

  15. Jaames says

    October 15, 2009 at 8:03 pm

    I was very impressed by it. I was skeptical going in, but I really enjoyed it in the end. I think there is a lot of potential for future stories which will hopefully bring some interest and originality back to the series. I could have lived without the sex scene, but other than that I thought it had a nice feel of seperation/desperation, while Eli was able to bring in some of the trademark Stargate humor. Plus the effects were very well done and the Destiny looks awesome.

  16. Skiznot says

    October 20, 2009 at 12:10 am

    The other Stargate shows were always for lazy Sunday watching, fun but not “must see.” SG-U is now my #1 Sci-fi must see show. I gotta have my space ships.

  17. Kwisatz Haderach says

    October 29, 2009 at 4:10 am

    ditto Skiznot !

  18. nytrydr says

    December 15, 2009 at 10:38 am

    Whilst I can certainly se why some folks didn’t enjoy it (boring in places, slow exposition etc) and whilst the tag “Battlestar: gatevoyager” wold be appt for the first 2 hours of the premiere (all I have seen, and was only aired here last night), I reckon it was very good. Maybe I expected it to suck (or blow depending on whether you are inside or outside the ship). Eli was funny enough, McStone was creepy, and the newly in charge military guy struggled to find his own voice of authority. Tried and true territory of an SG show. i admit, I will take bad sf over none, but this wasn’t bad SF, it was TBC SF, and will improve as holes get infilled.

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts

Slice

Follow Slice of SciFi

  • bluesky
  • twitter
  • youtube
  • facebook

Listen to Slice of SciFi

  • iheartradio
  • pocketcasts
  • playerfm

Subscribe to Podcast

Apple PodcastsSpotifyiHeartRadioPodchaserPodcast IndexTuneInRSS

  • Movie & TV Reviews

Recent Comments

  • Curt Myers on 4K Review: “Dogma” 25th Anniversary Special Edition brings a lost classic home again: “The best the movie has looked. It’s dialogue heavy so the Atmos track is rarely used. When it comes in…”
  • Summer Brooks on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “I requested it. I always get a little curious when TV shows or films get abandoned or canceled then continue…”
  • anh on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “Great interview! And it’s good that it clarifies some things. But this interview…. was it requested by the publisher or…”
  • Luis on Reviewing “Return to Sender”: “Benny was a f*ck-ass dog that attacked her for no reason at all. Miranda may be a killer but she…”
  • Summer Brooks on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “The promotional material I’d received wasn’t clear enough on that for me, alas. I’d always thought Winx Fate was a…”
Neil deGrasse Tyson Bill Nye

Slice of SciFi
415 Pisgah Church Rd #302
Greensboro NC 27455-2590
602-635-6976

Artwork:
Slice of SciFi galaxy spiral designed by Tim Callender

Theme Music:
Slice of SciFi music and themes
courtesy of Sci-Fried

Sister Sites:
Writers, After Dark
The Babylon Podcast
Charlie Jade Verse
Slice of SciFi TV

Slice

Copyright Slice of SciFi © 2005–2026 · WordPress · Log in