• Home
  • Podcast
    • Specials
  • Interviews
  • Movie Reviews
  • TV Reviews
  • DVD Reviews
  • Columns
  • News
    • TV News
    • Film News
    • DVD News
    • Comics News
    • Online Entertainment News
    • Music News
    • Book News
    • Space News

Slice of SciFi

This is How We Geek Out: Interviews, Reviews & More

  • Writers, After Dark
  • The Babylon Podcast
  • Slice of SciFi TV
  • Charlie Jade Verse
  • Contact Us
    • About Us

“Snakes” Drops Down the B.O. Hole

August 27, 2006 By Sam Sloan 5 Comments

After barely squeeking into first place in its weekend opening and holding on to that position for its first full week of viewing in theaters, “Snakes On a Plane” took a real nose-dive in its second weekend. Soundly beaten by the football bio-pic “Invincible,” which is estimated to take over the number one slot, “Snakes” will not even be able to go to number two. It is being projected that the Will Ferrell film, “Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby,” in its fourth week at theaters still will hold the number two position at the box office.

So, just where is “Snakes On a Plane” projected to land after the full count is over this evening? Barely in the Top Ten, and resting at number nine. Also, this will be the first time in two months that the gigantic hit “Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest” may not be in the Top Ten. It is projected to slip to number eleven after the cash is counted tonight, but I don’t think anyone attached to the film is crying about it. In just 8 weeks, “Pirates” has grossed nearly $408 million domestic. It cost $225 million to make, so its already riding the gravy train.

“Snakes,” on the otherhand, while projected to eventually make a tidy profit over its $33 million production costs, has in two weeks only shoveled in an estimated $26 million.

We will have full weekend B.O. stats for you in a few days.

Filed Under: Box Office Reports

Comments

  1. David says

    August 28, 2006 at 12:16 am

    Not enough pre-release advertising?

    Hmmm!

  2. Sam says

    August 28, 2006 at 2:49 pm

    I think it has more to do with the fact that Sam was in it and people expect much much more than a simple premise like a movie about snakes on a plane from him.

    People have forgotten that sometimes a movie is just for fun….no big special hidden message, just plain fun to go to and be frightened by something beyond zombies and vampires…..and that is exactly why actors of the high caliber Samuel L. Jackson and Julianna Margulies did the film…just to have a blast doing it. And, that is exactly the attitude that viewers of the film needed to have upon entering the theater in order to get it and have fun too.

    All the advance hype on this film did put off quite a few people, but it would have been the same people who probably wouldn’t have gone in the first place, or, would have gotten up after about the first half hour and walked off. My wife, didn’t care for it, and had she not been married to me, would have never gone.

    Me, I loved it. I took it for what it was…a good old fashion, shit in your pants Saturday Matinee movie about mutha f**kin’ snakes on a mutha f**kin’ plane at 30,000 feet. I went to the movie knowing that was what I was going to get and I was not at all disappointed.

    It was not a stinking pile of donkey shit, and was certainly a far cry better than most of the crap that gets pawned on viewers today that intends to intentionally scare and frighten.

  3. TllGrrl says

    August 28, 2006 at 10:13 pm

    I’m thinking that there will be a nice chunk o’ change made with the DVD in sales and rentals.
    I can think of a couple of friends of mine who’ll be getting Snakes for Christmahanukwanza!!
    : )

  4. Mark in St. Louis says

    August 28, 2006 at 10:50 pm

    Sam,

    Couldn’t agree more. I couldn’t get my wife to see it: she HATES snakes. But I loved it, and so did my 13 year old. He’s the type that sat through the movie pointing out that most of them weren’t poisonous (“That one’s a milk snake: it wouldn’t kill you”: that kind of stuff).

  5. mikeRabil says

    August 29, 2006 at 9:29 pm

    internet hype != $profit. learn from serenity.

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts

Slice

Follow Slice of SciFi

  • bluesky
  • twitter
  • youtube
  • facebook

Listen to Slice of SciFi

  • iheartradio
  • pocketcasts
  • playerfm

Subscribe to Podcast

Apple PodcastsSpotifyiHeartRadioPodchaserPodcast IndexTuneInRSS

  • Movie & TV Reviews

Recent Comments

  • Xander Rohrig on Check Out the Cupcake Games: “its dig dug”
  • Curt Myers on 4K Review: “Dogma” 25th Anniversary Special Edition brings a lost classic home again: “The best the movie has looked. It’s dialogue heavy so the Atmos track is rarely used. When it comes in…”
  • Summer Brooks on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “I requested it. I always get a little curious when TV shows or films get abandoned or canceled then continue…”
  • anh on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “Great interview! And it’s good that it clarifies some things. But this interview…. was it requested by the publisher or…”
  • Luis on Reviewing “Return to Sender”: “Benny was a f*ck-ass dog that attacked her for no reason at all. Miranda may be a killer but she…”
Neil deGrasse Tyson Bill Nye

Slice of SciFi
415 Pisgah Church Rd #302
Greensboro NC 27455-2590
602-635-6976

Artwork:
Slice of SciFi galaxy spiral designed by Tim Callender

Theme Music:
Slice of SciFi music and themes
courtesy of Sci-Fried

Sister Sites:
Writers, After Dark
The Babylon Podcast
Charlie Jade Verse
Slice of SciFi TV

Slice

Copyright Slice of SciFi © 2005–2026 · WordPress · Log in