• Home
  • Podcast
    • Specials
  • Interviews
  • Movie Reviews
  • TV Reviews
  • DVD Reviews
  • Columns
  • News
    • TV News
    • Film News
    • DVD News
    • Comics News
    • Online Entertainment News
    • Music News
    • Book News
    • Space News

Slice of SciFi

This is How We Geek Out: Interviews, Reviews & More

  • Writers, After Dark
  • The Babylon Podcast
  • Slice of SciFi TV
  • Charlie Jade Verse
  • Contact Us
    • About Us

Ready for “Chuck” in 3-D?

February 2, 2009 By Mike Hickerson 4 Comments

Did you get your free 3-D glasses for tonight’s mid-season return of “Chuck”?

If you did, you can enjoy the show in all its 3-D glory.  If you didn’t, there’s still time to pick up a free set at a store near you.  And if you can’t find them, you should tune in anyway for one of the most enjoyable hours on television.  Even without the 3-D glasses, “Chuck” should prove to be fun this evening.

NBC sent over a couple of sneak previews and behind the scenes looks at tonight’s episode for you to enjoy.

“Chuck” returns at 8 p.m. EST tonight on NBC.

Filed Under: TV News

Comments

  1. ejdalise says

    February 2, 2009 at 5:49 pm

    Nope, no glasses. Kind of made a half-hearted effort to find them, but none of the numerous places I went to (two places) which were listed as carrying the glasses even knew what I was talking about. Perhaps I will ask around and see if anyone did manage to get them, and is interested in giving them to me before they throw them away.

    I think this is a step back for what I consider a good show. From the previews, it seems to fall into the same trap as all other 3-D efforts: gratuitous and pointless scenes aimed not so much to advance the plot, but at giving you the illusion of someone trying to stick something up your nose.

    My only hope is tonight’s episode is a stand-alone effort not important to the thread running through the series. If it is, I will have missed it, and it might diminish my enjoyment of future episodes. Episodes I hope will be firmly anchored within the confines of my flat screen TV.

    Reply
  2. Sam Sloan says

    February 3, 2009 at 6:38 am

    I watched in 3D. Nothing “3D” gratuitous was in this episode. It was shot just like any other episode of Chuck. No knives coming at the camera, nothing jutting out at you. There was one homage to that kind of thing when the Buy More boss grabbed a donut to eat, but that was about it.

    TV still has a long way to go to make 3D a viable and interesting enough technology for anyone to put their eyes through an hour long program. Still a lot of color is lost and the 3D isn’t as impressive as it is in big screen movies.

    All that aside, the episode’s storyline was a pretty good one.

    Reply
  3. ejdalise says

    February 3, 2009 at 7:58 am

    Hmmm. . . the previews for the show seemed to concentrate on 3-d-ish scenes; maybe I’m remembering wrong.

    Anyway, I will wait to see it until I get some of the glasses as watching it without the glasses will just annoy me. Come to think of it, wearing the glasses will annoy me as well. I was hoping I could watch it without, but if the SuperBowl 3-d advert is any indication, I don’t think I could take an hour of it.

    I might check on-line . . . perhaps the online show is shown as regular video.

    Reply
  4. ejdalise says

    February 4, 2009 at 6:05 pm

    We watched the episode last night . . . perhaps I was overly sensitive to it, but there were a number of scenes “for 3-D”, such as knives thrown at the camera, and a few other things. Nothing over the top, but I definitively recognized them as 3-D shots.

    I scored some glasses from a co-worker’s kids, but we only wore them for about 10min or so. The effect was pretty good, but the very dark purple was a distraction I was constantly aware of. Perhaps my eyes are sensitive, but after the ten minutes I had to take the glasses off because my right eye was starting to bother me (I wanted to rub it, as if it was occluded and in need of clearing).

    Personally, I think they have a looooooooong way to go before the experience is something I would enjoy, but then perhaps I’m not the target audience.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts

Slice

Follow Slice of SciFi

  • youtube
  • bluesky
  • twitter
  • facebook

Listen to Slice of SciFi

  • iheartradio
  • pocketcasts
  • playerfm

Subscribe to Podcast

Apple PodcastsSpotifyiHeartRadioPodchaserPodcast IndexTuneInRSS

  • Movie & TV Reviews

Recent Comments

  • Xander Rohrig on Check Out the Cupcake Games: “its dig dug”
  • Curt Myers on 4K Review: “Dogma” 25th Anniversary Special Edition brings a lost classic home again: “The best the movie has looked. It’s dialogue heavy so the Atmos track is rarely used. When it comes in…”
  • Summer Brooks on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “I requested it. I always get a little curious when TV shows or films get abandoned or canceled then continue…”
  • anh on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “Great interview! And it’s good that it clarifies some things. But this interview…. was it requested by the publisher or…”
  • Luis on Reviewing “Return to Sender”: “Benny was a f*ck-ass dog that attacked her for no reason at all. Miranda may be a killer but she…”
Neil deGrasse Tyson Bill Nye

Slice of SciFi
415 Pisgah Church Rd #302
Greensboro NC 27455-2590
602-635-6976

Artwork:
Slice of SciFi galaxy spiral designed by Tim Callender

Theme Music:
Slice of SciFi music and themes
courtesy of Sci-Fried

Sister Sites:
Writers, After Dark
The Babylon Podcast
Charlie Jade Verse
Slice of SciFi TV

Slice

Copyright Slice of SciFi © 2005–2026 · WordPress · Log in