• Home
  • Podcast
    • Specials
  • Interviews
  • Movie Reviews
  • TV Reviews
  • DVD Reviews
  • Columns
  • News
    • TV News
    • Film News
    • DVD News
    • Comics News
    • Online Entertainment News
    • Music News
    • Book News
    • Space News

Slice of SciFi

This is How We Geek Out: Interviews, Reviews & More

  • Writers, After Dark
  • The Babylon Podcast
  • Slice of SciFi TV
  • Charlie Jade Verse
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
5 Episodes In: “Houdini & Doyle” Fox's Victorian take on "The X-Files" has charm despite the historical "liberties"

5 Episodes In: “Houdini & Doyle” Fox's Victorian take on "The X-Files" has charm despite the historical "liberties"

June 9, 2016 By Gini Koch Leave a Comment

True Confession: I wasn’t sure if this was going to be something I’d enjoy – because I still kid myself that I can ignore anything even remotely connected to Sherlock Holmes – and so decided to watch Houdini & Doyle pretty much at the last minute. And I’m glad I did.

The premise is pretty much Victorian X-Files crossed with Castle, but that’s what makes it fun. Houdini (Michael Weston) and Doyle (Stephen Mangan) are friendly but they disagree on the issue of the paranormal: Doyle, the creator of the logical “just the facts” thinking of Sherlock Holmes firmly believes in the paranormal, and Houdini, the greatest magician of his day, firmly does not and is always looking to debunk whatever comes their way. They end up helping Scotland Yard and its first female constable, Adelaide Stratton (Rebecca Liddiard), to solve bizarre crimes.

Houdini & Doyle
L-R: Michael Weston, Stephen Mangan and Rebecca Liddiard in HOUDINI & DOYLE (Mondays 9:00-10:00 PM ET/PT) on FOX. © 2016 FOX Broadcasting Co.

Adelaide has some secrets herself, and Houdini makes it his business to find out what her history is, in between finding murderers, solving cold cases, and finding kidnapped children. Doyle, meanwhile, has his own troubles – his wife is in a coma due to tuberculosis and his two children need more reassurances than he’s able to give. Plus, everyone wants him to bring Sherlock Holmes back from the dead and he really doesn’t want to do so.

Don’t go looking for historical accuracy. The show is set some 20 years before the real Houdini and Doyle ever met. Houdini is shown to be a dashing playboy who’s also devoted to his mother when, in real life, he was already married and his mother dead at the time the show is set. Scotland Yard didn’t have women on the force until after WWI. There’s more, but all of this doesn’t bother me all that much – it’s fiction and I’m finding it entertaining, so I’m willing to ignore the many anachronisms (like Houdini’s dialog) and factual errors. I credit this to the three leads, by the way, because normally anachronisms like this make me want to scream.

What’s harder to ignore is now bright and clean the show looks. There is literally no dirt anywhere unless the script calls for it. I wouldn’t want to get the lovely costumes and sets dirty, either, but since Doyle himself described the dirt of London’s streets time and time again, to be able to see every cobblestone as if you were actually in Disneyland is a little distracting. Everything gleams, everyone is clean, and little is out of place. It’s a very sanitized version of the London of the day.

However, the pleasure is in the paranormal investigations that usually give us a rational answer, though, just as in The X-Files, there’s almost always a hint that the paranormal is really there. Another pleasure is in listening to both men, Houdini in particular, discuss “known scientific fact” which we now know to be wrong.

I wasn’t sure if I could see past the two roles I know Michael Weston from the best – his guest starring roles on Elementary and Psych. But his characters on those two shows couldn’t be more different, and I’m enjoying him on this show as well. (And he also has the distinction of having guest starred on House. Meaning he’s been on three shows starring Sherlock Holmes or characters based on Holmes, and is now starring with the “creator” of Holmes. Not sure if this puts him in the record books, but it’s an interesting bit of trivia.)

Will this turn-of-the-last-century Scully and Mulder get renewed? No idea, it’s currently being billed as a 10-part event. So enjoy some Victorian X-Files while you can – before Houdini & Doyle pulls a Houdini and disappears.

Rating: 4 Stars

5 Episodes In: "Houdini & Doyle"
4

Summary

The premise is pretty much Victorian X-Files crossed with Castle, but that’s what makes it fun. Houdini (Michael Weston) and Doyle (Stephen Mangan) are friendly but they disagree on the issue of the paranormal: Doyle, the creator of the logical “just the facts” thinking of Sherlock Holmes firmly believes in the paranormal, and Houdini, the greatest magician of his day, firmly does not and is always looking to debunk whatever comes their way.

Will this turn-of-the-last-century Scully and Mulder get renewed? No idea, it’s currently being billed as a 10-part event. So enjoy some Victorian X-Files while you can – before Houdini & Doyle pulls a Houdini and disappears.

Filed Under: TV Reviews

About Gini Koch

Gini Koch writes the fast, fresh and funny Alien/Katherine "Kitty" Katt series for DAW Books, the Necropolis Enforcement Files, and the Martian Alliance Chronicles. She also has a humor collection, Random Musings from the Funny Girl. As G.J. Koch she writes the Alexander Outland series and she's made the most of multiple personality disorder by writing under a variety of other pen names as well, including Anita Ensal, Jemma Chase, A.E. Stanton, and J.C. Koch. She has stories featured in a variety of excellent anthologies, available now and upcoming, writing as Gini Koch, Anita Ensal, and J.C. Koch. Reach her via: www.ginikoch.com

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts

Slice

Follow Slice of SciFi

  • bluesky
  • twitter
  • youtube
  • facebook

Listen to Slice of SciFi

  • iheartradio
  • pocketcasts
  • playerfm

Subscribe to Podcast

Apple PodcastsSpotifyiHeartRadioPodchaserTuneInRSS

  • Movie & TV Reviews

Recent Comments

  • Summer Brooks on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “I requested it. I always get a little curious when TV shows or films get abandoned or canceled then continue…”
  • anh on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “Great interview! And it’s good that it clarifies some things. But this interview…. was it requested by the publisher or…”
  • Luis on Reviewing “Return to Sender”: “Benny was a f*ck-ass dog that attacked her for no reason at all. Miranda may be a killer but she…”
  • Summer Brooks on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “The promotional material I’d received wasn’t clear enough on that for me, alas. I’d always thought Winx Fate was a…”
  • hannaferdz on “FATE: The Winx Saga” writer Olivia Cuartero-Briggs talks adapting properties: “What a huge mistake whoever wrote this. Could you at least do some research? The graphic novels aren’t a continuation…”
Neil deGrasse Tyson Bill Nye

Slice of SciFi
415 Pisgah Church Rd #302
Greensboro NC 27455-2590
602-635-6976

Artwork:
Slice of SciFi galaxy spiral designed by Tim Callender

Theme Music:
Slice of SciFi music and themes
courtesy of Sci-Fried

Sister Sites:
Writers, After Dark
The Babylon Podcast
Charlie Jade Verse
Slice of SciFi TV

Slice

Copyright Slice of SciFi © 2005–2025 · WordPress · Log in