Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Podcast
      • Slice of SciFi 1022: Shakespeare, Star Wars and moreIan Doescher on Shakespeare and Science Fiction
      • Slice of SciFi 1021: The PassengerInternational Indie Horror: “The Passenger”
      • Slice of SciFi 1020: "Zero Contact" director Rick Dugdale“Zero Contact” Director Rick Dugdale
      • Slice of SciF 1019: Shark Bait“Shark Bait”: James Nunn on setting up the shark
    • View all
  • Movie Reviews
      • Review: The Black Phone (2022)“The Black Phone” is a creepy, retro thriller
      • Review: "Jurassic World: Dominion" (2022)“Jurassic World Dominion”: a people-pleasing spectacle
      • Jazz Fest: A New Orleans Story (2022)“Jazz Fest: A New Orleans Story”: A loving tribute to New Orleans
      • Emergency (2022)“Emergency” shines a light on race, stress and decision-making
    • View all
  • TV Reviews
      • "Project Blue Book"“Project Blue Book” explores the threads of UFO reports
      • Manifest Season 1: 5 Episodes In5 Episodes In: “Manifest”
      • 5 Episodes In: Reverie5 Episodes In: “Reverie”
      • 5 Episodes In: Marvel's Cloak and Dagger5 Episodes In: “Marvel’s Cloak & Dagger”
    • View all
  • DVD Reviews
      • Discussion: The Spine Of Night (2021)Indie Talk: Another Look at “The Spine of Night”
      • Review: Creepshow S2 Blu-rayBlu-ray Review: “Creepshow Season 2”
      • Batman: The Long Halloween (2021)“Batman: The Long Halloween”: an effective if over-long story
      • Blu-ray: Seance (2021)Blu-ray review: “Seance”
    • View all
  • Columns
  • News
      • TV News
      • Film News
      • DVD News
      • Interviews
      • Events
      • Geeky, Funny & Weird
      • Online Entertainment News
      • Music News
      • On Stage
      • Space News

Slice of SciFi

This is How We Geek Out: Interviews, Reviews & More

  • Writers, After Dark
  • The Babylon Podcast
  • Slice of SciFi TV
  • Horror Happenings
  • SciFi Shop Talk
  • Contact Us
Producer Says “Eureka” Canceled for Budget Reasons

Producer Says “Eureka” Canceled for Budget Reasons

August 15, 2011 By Mike Hickerson 31 Comments

Eureka producer Amy Berg says the reason the plug was pulled on the series was a financial one for Syfy.

Berg tweeted last week that was the show was Syfy’s “golden child” the price tag for a series six was what doomed the show.

“Everyone is asking why [the show was canceled]. It’s simple, really. We are the network’s golden child in every way, except profit margins. Fact is, Eureka is an expensive show to make,” she said on Twitter. “We could not maintain the quality of our show with the cuts it would take to make us profitable for Syfy’s new parent company.”

Berg went on to say that Syfy wanted to renew the show and worked to try to make that a reality. But in the end, that didn’t happen.

“Trust me, they love us,” she said. “We just couldn’t make the numbers work.”

Berg confirmed that a fourteenth episode has been added to season five to serve as a series wrap-up.

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Email

Filed Under: TV News Tagged With: Eureka, Syfy Channel

Related Posts

Strathairn Talks About “Alphas”
Robot Combat League
Syfy Picks Up “Merlin” Season 4

Comments

  1. AndyMac says

    August 15, 2011 at 10:24 am

    From this month’s issue of Duh Magazine…

    It’s always about money. It will never not be about money.

    Reply
    • Taylor says

      August 15, 2011 at 10:38 am

      Although continuing the show would be splendid, if it resulted in a significant lack of quality, that would quite possibly be worse than cancellation.

      A sci-tech show like Eureka needs them special effects!

      Reply
  2. Taylor says

    August 15, 2011 at 10:36 am

    Eureka *DOES* have absolutely great special effects, every episode. I can’t imagine those being cheap to produce. The episode with the crime-detecting lenses was a great example.

    I’m majorly disappointed about the cancellation. I can understand it, in some measures and lights. It’s nice to hear that SyFy tried to make it work at least (hard enough or not, I can’t say, not being privy to the details’ details!).

    Reply
  3. John Keegan says

    August 15, 2011 at 10:44 am

    Which is pretty much what I’ve been saying HAD to be the reason since the beginning…not some ridiculous notion that Syfy wanted to screw the fans.

    Reply
  4. Sam says

    August 15, 2011 at 10:47 am

    So, you take that money used to bring “wrasling” & those ridiculous Saturday movies on SyFy and put it into decent programming like Eureka. Duh! God, who runs that frackin’ network? Oh yeah, NBC/Universal – I stand corrected.

    Reply
    • Will says

      August 15, 2011 at 11:54 am

      Those movies are pretty bad, but they seem to be getting more and more popular. For all we know, the wrestling and reality shows we love to hate on could be helping to fund some of those expensive sci-fi shows we love. Didn’t Fox recently say that the success of American Idol is what’s keeping Fringe on the air? Everything has it’s place. I just hope sci-fi still has as place on Syfy for a long time to come.

      Reply
    • REM1701 says

      August 15, 2011 at 3:21 pm

      Say what U want, WWE brings in the money and sponsors. That’s the BOTTOM-LINE! like it or not….

      Reply
      • Sam says

        August 16, 2011 at 6:38 am

        I don’t care if WWE brings in billions. If NBC/Universal wants to start a new “Wrasling” channel that costs them little & produces them tons of revenue, find, I don’t have a problem with that. However, to put that trash on a channel that is suppose to be dedicated to speculative fiction is “white trash” at best & a real slap in the face to all those fans that have stuck with the network for years.

        So, start the new wrasling network & take just 2% of the overflow profits from that filth & pour it into SyFy, thereby saving shows like SGU & Eureka while being able to produce at least “some” quality SF programming. Trust me, those of us who perform, write & participate in these kinds of productions are sometime willing to work on the cheap because we love the genre that much.

        Taking profits from one enterprise & using them in another use to be done all the time back in the day. Network news was always funded by more successful programming profits. Of course, that was in the day when the news division of a network was interested in the truth & not a personal bias or political agenda, which happened once 24hr cable news came on the scene causing networks to force their news divisions to produce their own profit. Then news became a matter of ratings, not fair and balanced reporting of events…but, that is a different rant for another media – not here on SoSF.

        Reply
        • REM1701 says

          August 16, 2011 at 6:34 pm

          That’s probably WHY U aren’t running a network but just watching like the rest of us….

          Reply
          • Sam Sloan says

            August 16, 2011 at 11:38 pm

            You’re probably right. We’re way to high on the evolutionary scale to ever be in charge of a television network.

      • USNinja says

        July 13, 2012 at 2:05 pm

        Perhaps those ‘wrastling’ shows are cheap to produce and bring in a lot of money, what you and quite often the execs don’t realize that Eureka makes money even on re-runs. How many ‘wrastling’ reruns have you ever watched? Even the die-hard fans of American Idol (probably the most popular reality show) do not watch reruns. Yet there are networks out there that DEPEND on reruns. The decision to cancel Eureka is a short-sighted view. A bean-counter is looking to make money ‘this season’, not looking ahead.

        Reply
    • Dave Burt says

      August 15, 2011 at 7:22 pm

      Well said Sam. They did the same with Farscape. When was the last time one of their “original” movie was actually science fiction? Ah well there’s an hour I’ll have to myself every week and it won’t be spent watching a show on a Universal NBC network.

      Reply
      • John Keegan says

        August 16, 2011 at 6:15 am

        Farscape was a completely different situation. Syfy at the time renewed that series for two seasons with enormous fanfare. The producers went into seasons 4/5 with expectation of lasting that long, and planned a two-season arc accordingly. Syfy then changed their minds halfway into the deal. That was egregious.

        In the case of Eureka, the show was always renewed season to season, and the producers weren’t planning beyond the season under current production (at least, any more than usual) for that very reason. There were no promises made, no contracts signed. Eureka’s fate was no different than for any other show up for consideration of renewal.

        So, apples and oranges. Context matters!

        Reply
    • Browncoat Marc says

      August 18, 2011 at 8:59 am

      Actually COMCAST now runs the network.

      Reply
  5. Joe says

    August 15, 2011 at 11:40 am

    So eureka cost more than Sgu? If Sgu was 2million per ep how much is eureka? Eureka has good numbers and when syfy cancelled Sgu the reason was the ratings couldn’t support the shows cost so now you have a show with that’s getting 2.1 or so an ep and it’s cancelled because of money? I just dontunderstand that crummy network. I also find the producers reason to be pr bs “could not maintain the quality of our show with the cuts it would take to make us profitable for Syfy’s new parent company.” are you telling that the show couldn’t have cut 1 character out or cut down slightly on visuals which I might say there are not intense visual effects every episode or most of the episode. I’m calling BS.syfy canned it so they could run more bad reality tv ormake room for something stupid.

    Doesnt really matter anyway because the network is horrible.

    Reply
  6. Sam says

    August 15, 2011 at 12:10 pm

    @Will: While what you say is probably quite logical in the world of network finanicing, however, as a fan of good, but hard-to-find scifi, I strongly resist that logic. It would be nice to find a place that produces quality programming for the sake of the art & not just the bottom line. But, that is a kind of thinking for some other plane of existence, not this one.

    Reply
  7. TallGrrl says

    August 15, 2011 at 1:32 pm

    …so instead, we’ll just order up some more “Ghostbustin’ International”, and some other “reality” b.s. And wrasslin’!

    I’ll admit, the “bad” movies are fun when you’re in the right (enhanced) mood.
    I’ve watched them with friends and had our own little Mystery Theatre 2011 going and it’s a fun time.
    But why not slash the Ghost Huntin’ budget, dump wrasslin’, and push that money over to Eureka?!
    If they did more funny, cheesy product placement, I wouldn’t mind because it was done well.
    Anyway, this cancelation is yet another TV travesty that makes it difficult for people to fall in love with a show.
    I’m afraid that the next show on the block will be Warehouse.
    When that happens, I’m out. I’ll be watching BBC America for Doctor Who and the Brit sci-fi adventure series, STARZ for Torchwood.
    I hope all of the Eureka cast does a Fillion and land fabulous hit TV shows, movies and whatever else brings them success.
    I’m going to sit somewhere and weep now.

    Reply
    • John Keegan says

      August 15, 2011 at 4:35 pm

      The show will run for five seasons. How is that a “TV travesty”, when by every measure, *any* show that runs five seasons is a hit with a respectable run?

      Reply
  8. Mich67 says

    August 15, 2011 at 2:11 pm

    Another reason to spend less time on SyFY…SGU then Eureka…the shows that are left (except for Haven) aren’t really to my liking. I watch Warehouse 13 but it’s not something that I have to see every week.

    Wonder if it really got the boot because of the money they are putting into Alphas(if that’s a hit…I tried watching and found it boring…but the commercials looked like it had quite a few special effects) Wouldn’t be the first time two shows on a network had to be chosen between due to a limited budget.

    Reply
    • John Keegan says

      August 15, 2011 at 4:37 pm

      I suspect that SGU’s cancellation had more to do with the meltdown of MGM, which almost killed several major film franchises, rather than solely Syfy’s budget concerns.

      Reply
  9. REM1701 says

    August 15, 2011 at 3:18 pm

    Surprise, surprise Syfy canceled a show because it got too expensive? See: BSG, Farscape, SG-1 etc, etc. Don’t get too attached to BSG-Blood and Chrome because as soon as the production costs rise they will pull-the-plug 🙁

    Reply
  10. Joe says

    August 15, 2011 at 3:21 pm

    If Sgu was cancelled for ratings and eureka for budget then being human is doomed. With the low rating that show is over.

    Reply
  11. not me says

    August 15, 2011 at 4:40 pm

    Maybe if they had a few hundred less cast members *sarcasm* it might not be so freaking expensive to produce. SGU also had a huge cast, as did BSG. WH13 with what, five or six regulars and a few guest stars – renewed. You can’t tell me the special effects on Eureka are that much better than WH13! Its all computer generated and can’t be that expensive anymore!

    Reply
  12. John says

    August 16, 2011 at 3:58 am

    Well, then what about Sanctuary? It’s almost entirely Green Screened and edited. That’s got to be costly. Will they be next? People have to remember that this is about money, not ratings. When it gets too expensive, it has to go. Otherwise, there would be no shows as the network would go under. It’s not a hobby, it’s a business. That’s all it is. I doubt the execs there are even truly SciFi fans. They’re people with MBA’s that look at numbers. Ratings numbers, financial numbers, etc. It’s all about the Red and Black. Stay in the Black, you’re great, go into the read, you have to get cut.

    Reply
    • Sam Sloan says

      August 16, 2011 at 11:44 pm

      Actually Sanctuary’s budget is a lot less than a show like Eureka or Haven & Warehouse 13 just because nearly all of it is shot on green screen using digital technology. When you factor in the cost of on location shooting, needing to get every shot in the absolute correct outdoor lighting, fighting the elements, transportation & a myriad of other problems & costs that location & studio setup shots costs, the use of green or blue screen & computer enhancement is fiscally sound. The cost goes down each season with the introduction of new, highly effective, more economical digital programming as well.

      Reply
      • TH says

        August 17, 2011 at 3:23 am

        For people commenting on budgets :
        Sanctuary has a budget of just under $2 million an episode, and they run a legendary tight ship. So that would have put SGU’s up around the $3 mil mark.
        Sanctuary’s producer’s also have said several times that being a majority of green screen does not save them money merely moves costs to another part of the production flow, however it does give them freedom for story telling settings.

        Reply
  13. Michael says

    August 16, 2011 at 11:55 pm

    If economic reasons are the cause to “Pull the Plug” on Eureka, it is Syfy Channel it self for the problem. They have shows with 11 and 12 episodes per season. There is very little time to build a true fan base. Look at Stargate and Stargate Atlantis they were both very, very, costly to produce, but with 22 episodes a season a fan base was able to be developed and maintained. Even today their DVD sales still sell well. So Eureka’s production costs are not the problem, Syfy and their parent company NBC/MSNBC is the problem. In time the other shows on Syfy will start to fail and nobody with the “suits” will be able to figure out why. It’s a real shame the old Sify channel was the number one channel I used to watch, but sence it was bought out and a new management team moved in it has really gone down hill. ( WWF give me a break )

    Reply
  14. Zexks says

    April 25, 2012 at 11:41 am

    The moment I saw ‘wraslin’ on their line up I knew it was the beginning of an ugly spiral down the drain. Nothing left to do now, but wait till the series that haven’t been cancelled yet, in favor of ‘reality’ tv, to get the axe.

    Reply
  15. Lucinda Cheng says

    June 19, 2012 at 5:44 pm

    Couldn’t the show find private contributors? Cooperate with engineering departments and computer animation departments of multiple universities. Let them do the work for half the costs. I don’t know….there are many ways to keep the show alive on a smaller scale.

    Reply
  16. Katie says

    July 10, 2012 at 11:54 am

    Maybe get rid of wrestling, the tired lame ghost shows and KEEP Eureka!! I am so done with syfy after this. Lame stupid shows is all it will have left. Maybe another network picking up the show????

    Reply
  17. Dale says

    July 14, 2012 at 5:13 pm

    I am an X rocket scientist from NASA and IMHO, I believe that Eureka has been the best SyFy show to go on the air for the last 5 years. I watch it religiously and live for its inspiration. I can well understand that SyFy needs to make a profit since this is business, but I believe you are making a big mistake by not listening to your Fan base SyFy. We are telling you in no uncertain terms, via many sites, Facebook, Twitter, Eureka.com, here, etc., GET RID of the cheesey Wrestling, Ghoast Hunting, Paranormal drivel, Black Out, Lost Girl with the gratuitous sex, and all the other lame reality show junk. You are insulting our intellegence. KEEP EUREKA!!!!

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Cost Kills Eureka: A “Subway-style” Opportunity? | Galactic Watercooler says:
    August 18, 2011 at 9:30 am

    […] producer Amy Berg’s tweets, explaining the reasons behind the show’s cancellation. From their news piece: “Everyone is asking why [the show was cancelled]. It’s simple, really. We are the […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Audio Productions
Awards News
Book News
Book Reviews
Columns
Comics News
DVD News
DVD Reviews
Entertainment Business News
Events
Fan Films
Fan Productions
Film News
Film Reviews
Gaming News
Geeky, Funny & Weird
Human Interest
Interviews
Music News
On Stage
Online Entertainment News
Science News
Slice of SciFi
Slice Video News
Space News
Specials
Technology News
TV News
TV Reviews

Subscribe to Podcast

Apple PodcastsGoogle PodcastsiHeartRadioStitcherPodchaserTuneInRSS

Listen to Slice of SciFi

iTunes
iHeart Radio
Player.FM
RSS
 
  • Movie & TV Reviews

Recent Comments

  • Summer Brooks on “Astrid & Lilly Save the World” Season 1 Breakdown: “I’m waiting on renewal news on this one, too. So much fun, and for next season I would love to…”
  • Neil A Ottenstein on “Astrid & Lilly Save the World” Season 1 Breakdown: “Finally got a chance to watch the last two episode tonight and then listened to this. Great to hear the…”
  • Chris Howley on “The Northman” brings a Viking legend to life: “Your review makes me want to see this movie, which I had previously decided to skip over. Of course, I’ll…”
  • Armando Ruiz on Aquaman vs Namor: “Namor can destroy DC’s fish man”
  • Louis C Howley on “Everything Everywhere All At Once” is delightfully subversive: “Thank you for that compliment. I agree that it is a very difficult film to summarize. I very much appreciate…”
Tweets by Slice of SciFi
death to humans 160x600
Save 10-50% on in-stock toys at TFAW.com.

Slice of SciFi
1121 Annapolis Rd PMB 238
Odenton MD 21113
602-635-6976

Artwork:
Slice of SciFi spiral logo designed by Tim Callender

Theme Music:
Slice of SciFi music and themes
courtesy of Sci-Fried

Sister Sites:
Writers, After Dark
Horror Happenings
SciFi Shop Talk
Slice of SciFi TV

Copyright © 2005–2022 · Magazine Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in