<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future of &quot;Chuck,&quot; &quot;Dollhouse&quot; Still Up in the Air</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sliceofscifi.com/2009/05/14/future-of-chuck-dollhouse-still-up-in-the-air/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sliceofscifi.com/2009/05/14/future-of-chuck-dollhouse-still-up-in-the-air/</link>
	<description>Science Fiction TV and Movie News, Interviews &#38; More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:32:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.sliceofscifi.com/2009/05/14/future-of-chuck-dollhouse-still-up-in-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-2353351</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 19:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sliceofscifi.com/?p=14867#comment-2353351</guid>
		<description>I think getting rid of Dollhouse would be even more premature than when they canceled Firefly. With the new Star Trek movie making hundreds of millions of dollars... Sci Fi fanatics are going to start blossoming and growing everywhere.

I admit the season was progressed slowly in the beginning. It wasn&#039;t until the episode &quot;Needs&quot; that I was really hooked. But now we&#039;ve got Alpha... and I LOVE Alan Tudyk! 

And come on FOX, American Idol has really slipped into the toilet this season. It&#039;s the same show it has been for the past 4 years, nothing new, nothing different. Even the decision to give the judges one chance to save one contestant was poorly used and didn&#039;t make one bit of difference. They should have used it to save Alexis Grace, or saved it for the way-to-early-elimination of Allison Iraheta.

Reality TV... especially the stuff you find on FOX&#039;s Reality TVchannel... is some of the weakest BS on the airwaves today. 

Give Dollhouse the opportunity to develop and grow. Most show&#039;s are slow-going in their maiden seasons. And this show has something FOX&#039;s other show&#039;s does not. A new and controversial story-line full of juicy moral dilemmas, a super hott cast of very talented actors... and a fan-base that will probably triple by the middle of the second season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think getting rid of Dollhouse would be even more premature than when they canceled Firefly. With the new Star Trek movie making hundreds of millions of dollars... Sci Fi fanatics are going to start blossoming and growing everywhere.</p>
<p>I admit the season was progressed slowly in the beginning. It wasn't until the episode "Needs" that I was really hooked. But now we've got Alpha... and I LOVE Alan Tudyk! </p>
<p>And come on FOX, American Idol has really slipped into the toilet this season. It's the same show it has been for the past 4 years, nothing new, nothing different. Even the decision to give the judges one chance to save one contestant was poorly used and didn't make one bit of difference. They should have used it to save Alexis Grace, or saved it for the way-to-early-elimination of Allison Iraheta.</p>
<p>Reality TV... especially the stuff you find on FOX's Reality TVchannel... is some of the weakest BS on the airwaves today. </p>
<p>Give Dollhouse the opportunity to develop and grow. Most show's are slow-going in their maiden seasons. And this show has something FOX's other show's does not. A new and controversial story-line full of juicy moral dilemmas, a super hott cast of very talented actors... and a fan-base that will probably triple by the middle of the second season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

