Slice of SciFi Poll Question For Week Beginning May 11, 2008

n

n
{democracy:78}

Comments

  1. Mr Wall says:

    I'd have to put the blame on Ang Lee, not Eric Bana for the 1st movies suckiness

  2. Sam says:

    Agreed Mr. Wall. However, for the average fan it is the lead actor that ultimately takes the hit since it is his/her face out there that has to deliver, even if it is badly written and directed film. Kind of like a President taking credit or receiving blame for the economy, when in reality they have little to no impact on the nation's economy. That's the face everyone sees.

  3. Kyle Nin says:

    I'm probably the only one, but I thought the first movie wasn't all that bad. This new one is coming way too soon, so I won't be seeing it until it comes out on DVD. The last one is still fresh in my mind, like I just saw it yesterday.

  4. Bill from MN says:

    After seeing Ironman and knowing Tony Stark makes an appearence in this makes me want to see this.

  5. I think Norton will indeed do much better than Bana, but it still remains to be seen if the lead actor is enough to save this movie. The CG Hulk still irks me.

  6. Arkle says:

    I still say they should go with Peter David Hulk over Jack Kirby Hulk. Those were always my favorite issues. I guess I just like the idea of a guy who could build a nuclear reactor in his sleep also just happening to have the ability to level a city with his bare hands. ;-)

Speak Your Mind

Connect with Facebook

*