Which of the following 13 movie sequels are you the LEAST interested in seeing?
Slice of SciFi #412: Listener Feedback Show
It's Friday and that means it's time for a bit of listener feedback! And we'll also find out the latest from Sweetleaf!
This is the show where our loyal, adoring, and inquisitive fans and listeners get to hear us comment on their comments about our stories and comments... it's the Circle of Entertainment Life!
Follow Slice of SciFi!
Sponsors and Partners
 |
 |
 |
|
Recent Comments
Loki: Not perfect, but lots of fun anyway. I say bravo for something a little different, and departing from the... Loki: I have to agree with Sean, if they re-imagine the series as something other than the moon traveling through...
Sam Sloan: Do I care who shot first? Nada! All I care about is that scumbag bounty hunter Greedo got his....
Inconnu: It’s been a little while sense anyone’s posted anything here, but I’m hoping someone will...
KGDC: Do I care? No. Han shot first. End of story.
Ryan: Lucas is a d-bag plain and simple.
Joe Klemmer: This is so depressing. The creator of something so significant has, over the last decade or so, ruined...
Big BS in PA: I think that even The Peoples Republic of California considers the Shooting of someone that pulls a...
I can't vote on this one, I don't care about any of them EXCEPT for Star Trek. Comic book movies suck for me, don't like them one bit, and the rest are squeals to films I don't like (or shows I don't like).
if anyone DOESN'T say bloodrayne.... they should be banned, lol
So Kimi, of all the sequels coming that you dislike, pick the one you hate the most....
I would pick Bloodrayne, except that I find disturbing horror movies even less appealing than bad sci-fi.
BloodRayne 2. like it's even a frakking question.
P.S. The Incredible Hulk is not a true sequel, but rather Marvel basically wanting a do-over. Which I am not against, although I think it would be wise to put MORE distance between the new one and the old one (which, could've been good, the potential was there, the people involved just kinda blew it).
Bloodrayne 2 should never have been uttered as a possibility of a sequel. The fact that someone gave them money to make a second one instead of doing something better with it boggles me.
So, am I the only person who didn't hate Ang Lee's Incredible Hulk?
I liked the stylization with the comic book inspired scene changes, and the only thing I didn't like was how the battle with his father at the end went. I just don't understand what the point of that was, not given how subtle Nolte's earlier appearances were regarding the man and the monster, and which one of those two he truly considered to be his son.
I'm actually curious to see Bloodrayne, actually, just to see how bad it can be
Actually no Summer, i liked the hulk, but it was mainly due to eric bana... i like him a lot at an actor, ever since black hawk down. Other then that... it still was a very entertaining movie. I have nothing against it.
It's too bad I couldn't vote twice - BloodRayne 2 and Saw IV are pretty much equally at the bottom of that list for me. I caved to the peer pressure and went with Ms. Rayne.
Summer, I also liked Ang Lee's Hulk just fine.. I'm anxious to see if the sequel steers more towards the comic canon.
Sequels are based on lack of imagination, so I'll hold off on the poll. Because I hold off on going to 99% of the sequels.
How can you say sequels are based on a lack of imagination? Thats an awful generalisation. Does the same hold true for books? A second book staring the same characters is a lack of imagination? I can think of about a billion Harry Potter fans who would probably disagree with that in the lead up to book 7. What about comics? Is the fact that characters like Batman and Superman are still being written 50 years and more since their creation a lack of imagination?? Last time I checked new creators were coming on board all the time and finding new and relevant things to say with characters that have been used time and time again. Why should it be an different with films?
I have never understood the fascination with watching someone getting brutally tortured just for the sheer joy of watching others suffer...so I can't stand original features, such as SAW, Texas Chainsaw Massacre or The Hills Have Eyes, much less remakes or sequels.
Much to bizarre for my taste...sort of like being an observer of Hussain's torture chambers or Nazi concentration camp experiments....No thanks -- unless it comes from the likes of Tarantino, then somehow it comes off as storytelling art and not slash and burn for the sake of the gore effect.
Sam, I can't vote still, I hate them all on the same level. I've got a very basic level of living things when it comes to not liking them, they all at the bottom.
I can't settle for just one. You can happily eliminate all the "horror" movies and Bloodrayne just ... because. Sam, I'm totally with you on that. Ever since the original Friday the 13th, when after the first poor girl's throat was cut and she cried and cried as the blood seeped out, and I commenced to placing my head between my knees for the rest of the movie, I was done with "horror".
But I will joyfully skip to every single superhero movie listed here. Because, dude! It's real life superheroes!!!!
Bloodrayne 2. I don't even know how anyone who saw the desaster that was Bloodrayne would think it was a good idea to hand over money for a sequel.