« Scientists Question Nature’s Fundamental Laws || Looking At The Dawn Of Life: Detailed Images Of Embryos More Than 500 Million Years Old »

SCi-Fi to Sci-FACT: CO2 Ocean Storage Is Considered

August 8, 2006 by Sam Sloan   || Category: Science News

Source: Monsters & Critics Science News
Submitted by: Kyle Nin (SoSF Staff Reporter)

Harvard University researchers say an innovative solution for carbon dioxide pollution might be found far beneath the surface of the ocean.

The scientists report finding deep-sea sediments that could provide a virtually unlimited and permanent reservoir for the gas that has been a primary driver of global climate change in recent decades. The scientists estimate seafloor sediments within U.S. territory are vast enough to store the nation’s carbon dioxide emissions for thousands of years to come.

Harvard’s Kurt Zenz House and Daniel Schrag, along with colleagues at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Columbia University, detail the advantages of sequestering excess carbon dioxide thousands of feet beneath the ocean’s surface in this week’s issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

*****

This may be a Sci-Fi to Sci-Fact related story, but can anyone see any real long-term good coming out of this? Or, am I wrong in thinking we have just found another way to pollute our oceans? Tell us what you think. - Sam

Netflix, Inc.

Comments

5 Responses to “SCi-Fi to Sci-FACT: CO2 Ocean Storage Is Considered”

  1. SteveChisnall on August 8th, 2006 7:25 pm

    Two words for you:

    LIMNIC ERUPTION

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limnic_eruption

    Doing this will create an enormous risk of a hideous natural (or in this case, artificial) hazard.

  2. V on August 9th, 2006 3:32 pm

    Besides what SteveChisnall said (excellent point!), it seems like a (proverbial) ostrich method to me. If applied it shouldn’t be the only method used; fighting the causes need to be part of the other methods applied.

    And if separating Carbon Dioxide from other gases is so easy, perhaps moving it to photosynthesizing plants is a beter solution.

  3. gina on August 9th, 2006 5:08 pm

    who cares, we will be moving to the moon in about 20 years anyway! Ha!

  4. RJP on August 21st, 2006 7:36 am

    A Lake Nyos on a massive scale would be catastrophic. No thanks!

  5. Sam on August 21st, 2006 7:50 am

    Many geologist and archeologist are convinced that is also what killed the first born of Egypt in 1500 BCE - the rise in CO2 from the waters of the Nile after the huge Santorini Volcanic eruption at the center of the pre-Grecian Minoan Empire.
    Since the first male born was given the place of honor every night to sleep at the lowest part of the home, while everyone else slept on the roof or on beds higher off the ground,, they were most suseptible to the low lying gases as the air currents moved them through the region.

    That is what happened to the 87 who died near Lake Nyos in 1987, including the death of hundreds of cattle and smaller animals near the lake. The only villagers who survived that night were those who were sleeping at least 4 or 5 feet off the ground.

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!